AWS r8gn.mediumvsAWS r8gn.metal-24xl

r8gn.medium pairs 1 vCPUs with 8GB of RAM at $0.0911/hr On-Demand (about $66/mo at 24×7). r8gn.metal-24xl pairs 96 vCPUs with 768GB at $8.7446/hr (~$6296/mo). r8gn.medium is 9499% cheaper per hour than r8gn.metal-24xl ($8.6535/hr gap).

Because both instances are in the **r8gn family**, the only thing that changes between them is sizing — same silicon, same architecture (AWS Graviton (ARM64)), same burstable/sustained behavior. The choice is purely about how much capacity you actually need: r8gn.medium gives you 1 vCPUs and 8GB of RAM, r8gn.metal-24xl gives you 96 vCPUs and 768GB. AWS scales pricing close to linearly within a family, so picking the right size is mostly about right-sizing your workload, not getting a better deal per vCPU.

On raw price-per-performance, the two are r8gn.medium delivers ~9130% more single-thread Sysbench score per dollar (35258 vs 382 points per $1/hr). That's the cleanest signal we have for "which one runs your workload faster per dollar," but it only matters if your workload is single-thread-bound; for parallel workloads the multi-core scores (3176 vs 319549) are what to weigh. Spot pricing flips many of these comparisons — when r8gn.medium drops to $0.0250/hr and r8gn.metal-24xl drops to $2.8932/hr, the cheap-per-hour winner can swing meaningfully.

In practice, pick r8gn.medium when your workload is closer to memory-optimized (memory-bound work — in-memory databases, real-time analytics, large caches). Pick r8gn.metal-24xl when it's closer to memory-optimized (memory-bound work — in-memory databases, real-time analytics, large caches). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.