AWS r7iz.4xlargevsAWS r7iz.metal-32xl

r7iz.4xlarge pairs 16 vCPUs with 128GB of RAM at $1.4880/hr On-Demand (about $1071/mo at 24×7). r7iz.metal-32xl pairs 128 vCPUs with 1024GB at $11.9040/hr (~$8571/mo). r7iz.4xlarge is 700% cheaper per hour than r7iz.metal-32xl ($10.4160/hr gap).

Because both instances are in the **r7iz family**, the only thing that changes between them is sizing — same silicon, same architecture (Intel Xeon (x86_64)), same burstable/sustained behavior. The choice is purely about how much capacity you actually need: r7iz.4xlarge gives you 16 vCPUs and 128GB of RAM, r7iz.metal-32xl gives you 128 vCPUs and 1024GB. AWS scales pricing close to linearly within a family, so picking the right size is mostly about right-sizing your workload, not getting a better deal per vCPU.

Benchmark data for at least one of these instances is still being collected, so a direct performance-per-dollar comparison isn't possible yet. Sysbench scores are 3370/27646 for r7iz.4xlarge and pending for r7iz.metal-32xl. Check back as the benchmark queue completes — newer-generation instances typically score 10–30% higher on single-thread and 15–50% higher on multi-core vs the previous generation in the same series.

In practice, pick r7iz.4xlarge when your workload is closer to memory-optimized (memory-bound work — in-memory databases, real-time analytics, large caches). Pick r7iz.metal-32xl when it's closer to memory-optimized (memory-bound work — in-memory databases, real-time analytics, large caches). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.