AWS r7g.16xlargevsAWS r7gd.16xlarge
r7g.16xlarge
r7gd.16xlarge
r7g.16xlarge vs r7gd.16xlarge: how to choose
r7g.16xlarge pairs 64 vCPUs with 512GB of RAM at $3.4272/hr On-Demand (about $2468/mo at 24×7). r7gd.16xlarge pairs 64 vCPUs with 512GB at $4.3546/hr (~$3135/mo). r7g.16xlarge is 27% cheaper per hour than r7gd.16xlarge ($0.9274/hr gap).
Both are generation-7 memory-optimized instances, but they run on different silicon: **r7g.16xlarge** is AWS Graviton (ARM64), **r7gd.16xlarge** is AWS Graviton (ARM64). AMD variants (suffix `a`) are typically 10% cheaper than Intel siblings at comparable single-thread performance. Graviton variants (suffix `g`) are usually 20–40% cheaper but require ARM64-compatible binaries — most modern Linux stacks are fine, but verify any compiled extensions, native modules, or third-party binaries before migrating. Same vCPU/RAM ratio, same network performance class, different processor.
On raw price-per-performance, the two are r7g.16xlarge delivers ~27% more single-thread Sysbench score per dollar (880 vs 693 points per $1/hr). That's the cleanest signal we have for "which one runs your workload faster per dollar," but it only matters if your workload is single-thread-bound; for parallel workloads the multi-core scores (192414 vs 192414) are what to weigh. Spot pricing flips many of these comparisons — when r7g.16xlarge drops to $0.8839/hr and r7gd.16xlarge drops to $1.2265/hr, the cheap-per-hour winner can swing meaningfully.
In practice, pick r7g.16xlarge when your workload is closer to memory-optimized (memory-bound work — in-memory databases, real-time analytics, large caches). Pick r7gd.16xlarge when it's closer to memory-optimized (memory-bound work — in-memory databases, real-time analytics, large caches). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.
On-Demand Price Comparison
Monthly trajectory
Spot Price Comparison
30-Day daily trajectory