AWS m5dn.12xlargevsAWS m5zn.12xlarge

m5dn.12xlarge pairs 48 vCPUs with 192GB of RAM at $3.2640/hr On-Demand (about $2350/mo at 24×7). m5zn.12xlarge pairs 48 vCPUs with 192GB at $3.9641/hr (~$2854/mo). m5dn.12xlarge is 21% cheaper per hour than m5zn.12xlarge ($0.7001/hr gap).

Both are generation-5 general-purpose instances, but they run on different silicon: **m5dn.12xlarge** is Intel Xeon (x86_64), **m5zn.12xlarge** is Intel Xeon (x86_64). AMD variants (suffix `a`) are typically 10% cheaper than Intel siblings at comparable single-thread performance. Graviton variants (suffix `g`) are usually 20–40% cheaper but require ARM64-compatible binaries — most modern Linux stacks are fine, but verify any compiled extensions, native modules, or third-party binaries before migrating. Same vCPU/RAM ratio, same network performance class, different processor.

On raw price-per-performance, the two are m5zn.12xlarge delivers ~11% more single-thread Sysbench score per dollar (348 vs 388 points per $1/hr). That's the cleanest signal we have for "which one runs your workload faster per dollar," but it only matters if your workload is single-thread-bound; for parallel workloads the multi-core scores (39266 vs 56947) are what to weigh. Spot pricing flips many of these comparisons — when m5dn.12xlarge drops to $1.3187/hr and m5zn.12xlarge drops to $1.2822/hr, the cheap-per-hour winner can swing meaningfully.

In practice, pick m5dn.12xlarge when your workload is closer to general-purpose (balanced general-purpose workloads with a 1:4 vCPU-to-memory ratio). Pick m5zn.12xlarge when it's closer to general-purpose (balanced general-purpose workloads with a 1:4 vCPU-to-memory ratio). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.