AWS i2.2xlargevsAWS i2.4xlarge

i2.2xlarge pairs 8 vCPUs with 61GB of RAM at $1.7050/hr On-Demand (about $1228/mo at 24×7). i2.4xlarge pairs 16 vCPUs with 122GB at $3.4100/hr (~$2455/mo). i2.2xlarge is 100% cheaper per hour than i2.4xlarge ($1.7050/hr gap).

Because both instances are in the **i2 family**, the only thing that changes between them is sizing — same silicon, same architecture (Intel Xeon (x86_64)), same burstable/sustained behavior. The choice is purely about how much capacity you actually need: i2.2xlarge gives you 8 vCPUs and 61GB of RAM, i2.4xlarge gives you 16 vCPUs and 122GB. AWS scales pricing close to linearly within a family, so picking the right size is mostly about right-sizing your workload, not getting a better deal per vCPU.

On raw price-per-performance, the two are i2.2xlarge delivers ~101% more single-thread Sysbench score per dollar (1491 vs 743 points per $1/hr). That's the cleanest signal we have for "which one runs your workload faster per dollar," but it only matters if your workload is single-thread-bound; for parallel workloads the multi-core scores (11798 vs 23942) are what to weigh. Spot pricing flips many of these comparisons — when i2.2xlarge drops to $0.2829/hr and i2.4xlarge drops to $0.9411/hr, the cheap-per-hour winner can swing meaningfully.

In practice, pick i2.2xlarge when your workload is closer to storage-optimized (NVMe SSD) (I/O-bound work needing low-latency NVMe local storage — NoSQL, search). Pick i2.4xlarge when it's closer to storage-optimized (NVMe SSD) (I/O-bound work needing low-latency NVMe local storage — NoSQL, search). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.