AWS c8i.8xlargevsAWS c8i-flex.16xlarge

c8i.8xlarge pairs 32 vCPUs with 64GB of RAM at $1.4994/hr On-Demand (about $1080/mo at 24×7). c8i-flex.16xlarge pairs 64 vCPUs with 128GB at $2.8486/hr (~$2051/mo). c8i.8xlarge is 90% cheaper per hour than c8i-flex.16xlarge ($1.3493/hr gap).

Because both instances are in the **c8i family**, the only thing that changes between them is sizing — same silicon, same architecture (Intel Xeon (x86_64)), same burstable/sustained behavior. The choice is purely about how much capacity you actually need: c8i.8xlarge gives you 32 vCPUs and 64GB of RAM, c8i-flex.16xlarge gives you 64 vCPUs and 128GB. AWS scales pricing close to linearly within a family, so picking the right size is mostly about right-sizing your workload, not getting a better deal per vCPU.

On raw price-per-performance, the two are c8i.8xlarge delivers ~90% more single-thread Sysbench score per dollar (2218 vs 1170 points per $1/hr). That's the cleanest signal we have for "which one runs your workload faster per dollar," but it only matters if your workload is single-thread-bound; for parallel workloads the multi-core scores (56026 vs 112233) are what to weigh. Spot pricing flips many of these comparisons — when c8i.8xlarge drops to $0.5733/hr and c8i-flex.16xlarge drops to $0.8768/hr, the cheap-per-hour winner can swing meaningfully.

In practice, pick c8i.8xlarge when your workload is closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). Pick c8i-flex.16xlarge when it's closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.