AWS c7i.4xlargevsAWS c7i-flex.4xlarge

c7i.4xlarge pairs 16 vCPUs with 32GB of RAM at $0.7140/hr On-Demand (about $514/mo at 24×7). c7i-flex.4xlarge pairs 16 vCPUs with 32GB at $0.6783/hr (~$488/mo). c7i-flex.4xlarge is 5% cheaper per hour than c7i.4xlarge ($0.0357/hr gap).

c7i.4xlarge (compute-optimized, Intel Xeon (x86_64)) and c7i-flex.4xlarge (compute-optimized, Intel Xeon (x86_64)) target different workload shapes. The vCPU:RAM ratios are different (16:32 vs 16:32), and depending on the architectures involved you may also see meaningful single-thread performance and per-hour-cost differences. This kind of cross-category comparison is most useful when you're early in the design phase and not yet sure whether your workload is CPU-bound, memory-bound, or balanced — once that's clear, the right pick is usually obvious.

On raw price-per-performance, the two are roughly tied on single-thread performance per dollar (4595 vs 4763 Sysbench points per $1/hr). That's the cleanest signal we have for "which one runs your workload faster per dollar," but it only matters if your workload is single-thread-bound; for parallel workloads the multi-core scores (26912 vs 27124) are what to weigh. Spot pricing flips many of these comparisons — when c7i.4xlarge drops to $0.2983/hr and c7i-flex.4xlarge drops to $0.2510/hr, the cheap-per-hour winner can swing meaningfully.

In practice, pick c7i.4xlarge when your workload is closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). Pick c7i-flex.4xlarge when it's closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.