AWS c6g.12xlargevsAWS c6g.metal

c6g.12xlarge pairs 48 vCPUs with 96GB of RAM at $1.6320/hr On-Demand (about $1175/mo at 24×7). c6g.metal pairs 64 vCPUs with 128GB at $2.1760/hr (~$1567/mo). c6g.12xlarge is 33% cheaper per hour than c6g.metal ($0.5440/hr gap).

Because both instances are in the **c6g family**, the only thing that changes between them is sizing — same silicon, same architecture (AWS Graviton (ARM64)), same burstable/sustained behavior. The choice is purely about how much capacity you actually need: c6g.12xlarge gives you 48 vCPUs and 96GB of RAM, c6g.metal gives you 64 vCPUs and 128GB. AWS scales pricing close to linearly within a family, so picking the right size is mostly about right-sizing your workload, not getting a better deal per vCPU.

Benchmark data for at least one of these instances is still being collected, so a direct performance-per-dollar comparison isn't possible yet. Sysbench scores are pending for c6g.12xlarge and 2812/179406 for c6g.metal. Check back as the benchmark queue completes — newer-generation instances typically score 10–30% higher on single-thread and 15–50% higher on multi-core vs the previous generation in the same series.

In practice, pick c6g.12xlarge when your workload is closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). Pick c6g.metal when it's closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.