AWS c5.metalvsAWS c5d.24xlarge

c5.metal pairs 96 vCPUs with 192GB of RAM at $4.0800/hr On-Demand (about $2938/mo at 24×7). c5d.24xlarge pairs 96 vCPUs with 192GB at $4.6080/hr (~$3318/mo). c5.metal is 13% cheaper per hour than c5d.24xlarge ($0.5280/hr gap).

Both are generation-5 compute-optimized instances, but they run on different silicon: **c5.metal** is Intel Xeon (x86_64), **c5d.24xlarge** is Intel Xeon (x86_64). AMD variants (suffix `a`) are typically 10% cheaper than Intel siblings at comparable single-thread performance. Graviton variants (suffix `g`) are usually 20–40% cheaper but require ARM64-compatible binaries — most modern Linux stacks are fine, but verify any compiled extensions, native modules, or third-party binaries before migrating. Same vCPU/RAM ratio, same network performance class, different processor.

Benchmark data for at least one of these instances is still being collected, so a direct performance-per-dollar comparison isn't possible yet. Sysbench scores are pending for c5.metal and 1289/90653 for c5d.24xlarge. Check back as the benchmark queue completes — newer-generation instances typically score 10–30% higher on single-thread and 15–50% higher on multi-core vs the previous generation in the same series.

In practice, pick c5.metal when your workload is closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). Pick c5d.24xlarge when it's closer to compute-optimized (CPU-bound work — batch processing, web servers under sustained load, game servers). When neither side is obviously right, the cheaper hourly rate usually wins for fault-tolerant batch workloads, while the higher single-core score usually wins for latency-sensitive web traffic. The regional pricing tables linked from each instance page below show where each is currently cheapest — sometimes a >20% regional gap flips the comparison entirely.